U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to find IPR process unconstitutional, patent market observers say

The U.S. Supreme Court is likely to uphold the constitutionality of the inter partes review (IPR) process in in Oil States v. Greene’s Energy Group despite what could be described as magical thinking by patent owners, patent market observers say. The high court took up only one of three questions presented by Oil States in [...]

By | June 14th, 2017|litigation, Patent Investing, PTAB, Supreme Court, USPTO|0 Comments

Michelle Lee’s abrupt resignation means USPTO may have to wait until Spring 2018 for a permanent replacement

The abrupt resignation of Michelle Lee as director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office means the agency is unlikely to get a permanent director until the spring of 2018, increasing uncertainty for patent owners who had been hoping President Trump would nominate a replacement more attuned to protecting intellectual property rights. The Trump administration [...]

Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland v. Kraft Food on venue seen having marginal but meaningful impact on nuisance suits

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland v. Kraft Food is expected to reduce the concentration of nuisance patent infringement lawsuits especially in the perceived patent owner friendly Eastern District of Texas, though it also will increase the number of cases in jurisdictions with much less patent experience. Patent market observers say the impact [...]

U.S. Supreme Court is likely to reverse Federal Circuit on venue in patent infringement suits

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to review a Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling involving the appropriate venue for patent infringement suits likely means a reversal that could hurt patent owner rights and end the dominance of the Eastern District of Texas as the most active district court for patent cases. The high [...]

By | December 14th, 2016|Federal Circuit, Patent Investing, Supreme Court|0 Comments